If you're applying to court about child arrangements, a MIAM is usually required first. Book online through our trusted digital service.
Book a MIAM →Key points
The term 'custody' was removed from English and Welsh family law in 1991 when the Children Act 1989 came into force. The Act replaced the concept of custody and access with a framework focused entirely on the child's welfare and their arrangements for living and spending time with each parent.
Despite this, 'custody' remains the term most people use when searching for information about their children after separation — and it is not wrong to use it in ordinary language. But understanding what the legal framework actually says helps parents navigate the system more effectively.
The phrase 'child custody' in everyday use generally maps onto what courts now call child arrangements — specifically, decisions about where a child lives and how much time they spend with each parent.
Plain English
When people say 'custody', they usually mean the child arrangements. When they say 'full custody', they typically mean they want the child to live primarily with them. When they say 'joint custody', they usually mean they want the child to spend significant time with both parents.
A child arrangements order has two main components, and they work differently:
'Lives with' specifies the parent or parents with whom a child primarily lives. This is what was formerly called 'residence'. An order may say a child lives with one parent (sole residence) or with both parents, with time split between their homes (shared residence or shared living arrangements). Having a 'lives with' order does not mean the other parent has no involvement — it simply records where the child is primarily based.
'Spends time with' specifies the time a child spends with the other parent — what was formerly called 'contact' or 'access'. This covers regular contact, holidays, special occasions, telephone or video contact, and any other arrangements the order specifies.
Read more: Child Arrangements Orders Explained
See also: Parental Responsibility — having a 'spends time with' order does not remove parental responsibility.
No. UK family law does not give mothers any automatic preferential right over fathers in child arrangements decisions. The law is explicitly gender-neutral. Both parents have equal standing to apply for any form of child arrangements order.
In practice, statistics show that in cases that reach court, children more often end up living primarily with their mother. But this reflects the specific circumstances of contested cases and historical patterns — it is not a legal presumption, and it does not mean fathers cannot or do not successfully apply for primary or shared residence.
Courts decide each case on its specific facts, with the welfare of the individual child as the paramount consideration.
The legal position
The Children Act 1989 creates no presumption in favour of either parent on the basis of gender. The only presumption is that a child's welfare is generally served by the involvement of both parents — unless the contrary is shown.
These terms are still used colloquially, and it helps to understand what they translate to in legal terms:
'Sole custody' in UK law means a child living primarily with one parent, with the other parent having contact — what courts call a 'lives with' order in favour of one parent and a 'spends time with' order for the other. The non-resident parent does not lose parental responsibility.
'Joint custody' typically means a shared living arrangement — a child arrangements order recording that the child lives with both parents, spending significant time with each. There is no legal requirement for an exact 50/50 split.
'Full custody' has no direct legal equivalent. People using this phrase usually mean they want the child to live with them exclusively, with the other parent having no contact — an outcome courts rarely order without serious welfare concerns.
Note
What custody arrangements are realistic in your situation depends on many practical factors — distance between parents' homes, work patterns, the child's age and school, and the quality of communication between the parents.
When parents cannot agree on arrangements and the matter goes to court, the judge makes decisions based on the welfare checklist set out in the Children Act 1989. This considers: the child's wishes and feelings; their physical, emotional, and educational needs; the likely effect of any change in circumstances; any harm they have suffered or risk suffering; and the capability of each parent to meet their needs.
Courts do not make custody decisions based on which parent is more 'deserving', who earns more, or who filed the application. The focus is always on the child — and courts start from the position that maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents is generally beneficial.
Before reaching court, parents are expected to attend a MIAM to explore whether mediation can help them agree. Most child arrangements disputes that reach the MIAM stage resolve without needing a judge to decide.
Read more: What Does CAFCASS Do? — how CAFCASS advises the court in contested cases.
UK family courts no longer use the terms sole custody or joint custody. Instead, a child arrangements order specifies who a child lives with and who they spend time with. What is colloquially called joint custody typically means the child spends significant time with both parents, often recorded in a shared living arrangement.
UK courts do not award custody — they make child arrangements orders. The paramount consideration is always the welfare of the child, not the preferences of either parent. Courts start from the presumption that involvement of both parents is beneficial unless there is evidence this would put the child at risk of harm.
Understanding that UK law focuses on arrangements rather than custody is a starting point — not a strategy. Before making any decisions, it is worth understanding what a child arrangements order actually provides, what parental responsibility means, and whether mediation could help you reach agreement without court involvement.
The articles in this section cover each of these topics in detail.
You may also want to learn about:
Before applying to court, most child custody disputes can be resolved through family mediation — often faster and with less lasting impact on the children involved.
Arrange Your MIAM OnlineDelivered by qualified family mediators in line with UK mediation standards.
Most child arrangements are agreed without a judge having to decide.
Mediation gives both parents a voice — and children a better outcome.
In this section
Need a MIAM?
Book Now